Sunday, May 24, 2009

Showing Up For Life

During the Berkshire Meeting I bought Bill Gates Senior's new book called "Showing Up For Life." I spoke with Sr briefly, told him I enjoyed his book on the estate tax which educated me and successfully changed my views, and had him sign my copy of his latest. This book was originally written for his own family but ended up being picked up and published. He and Bill Gates Jr. sat down with Charlie Rose the other day, and the hour-long discussion is up on the website for free.

Listening to people that smart have a chat isn't a bad way to relax and enjoy your Sunday morning.

Monday, May 11, 2009

Meredith Whitney correctly predicts the future.

I couldn't agree more with the 10 minute interview Meredith Whitney gave on the floor of the exchange. She explains to you why banks will have great manufactured earnings in Q2 and Q3 and then terrible earnings after that. Even my good friend Nemo is taking notice of the likelihood of manufactured earnings.

Found this interview via Dealbreaker.











In case you love accounting

For those of you who want a more "wonkish" (to borrow a made up term from Paul Krugman) explanation of what will be going on with bank balance sheets with writedowns and the race between those and earnings, there is a good post by CR on the subject. It is simple to follow and isn't terribly long.

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Seven questions for me on the stock market.

What is going on with the stock market?

This:
Why is that happening?

Most people do not take the time to read reports and analyze tables. They are largely guided by three emotions; greed, fear, and jealousy. The market spiraled downward because people were fearful that they would lose everything and just wanted out at any price. Now people are full of jealousy (of those who already bought in) and greed and don't want to miss out on the gains and just want to buy at any price. They read anything that says the recession is over and ignore everything else.

But what about the bank stress tests that say the banks are solvent? That the banks will earn their way out of their writedowns?

The bank stress tests were a sham. The purpose of the results was decided before the tests began -- the purpose would be to reassure investors. The regulators (term used lightly) produced optimistic, reassuring results. But that wasn't enough. They then allowed their subjects to negotiate with them because oversized financial institutions now have oversized influence on our nation's government. The government went along with this and severely reduced the amount of capital they claim the banks will need to survive.

But that wasn't enough either. Rather than actually needing to raise capital to cover all the writedowns, the government is now letting banks convert preferred shares into common to take care of most of it. This is financial alchemy which adds nothing to the real world balance sheet. It also, once again, screws the taxpayer who used to be first in line to be repaid in the event of bank failure and will now be last in line.

Yes, but won't this prevent financial stocks from falling anyway? Maybe they will just trade sideways for years?

No. There are still financial shocks to come to the system. There will have to be writedowns no matter how long the banks try to put it off. What's more, there is a lot of money that needs to be raised by an awful lot of banks. There are a lot of banks out there, and most of them are not the top 20 largest which have a lot of lobbying power. This is not financial Lake Wobegon. Many of these banks will not be able to raise the money they do need to raise from private investors, because PE investors know about the coming writedowns, and if these banks aren't too big too fail there is no desire on the part of Congress to grant more money to bail them out.

But what about all the fundamental economic data that looks like they are turning positive? What about the "green shoots" in the economy?

There are no green shoots. When times are bad and people are scared, they no longer view data on seasonally adjusted terms. They also do not view data on year-over-year terms, as they did when times were good. They only view things month-to-month and quarter-to-quarter, looking for any uptick.

It is important to know that essentially everything is still declining no matter what terms you use, but the reason why people are saying the recession is over is not because things have turned positive but because they are declining at a slower rate than before. It doesn't matter whether you pick imports, exports, manufacturing, retail sales, whatever. All of those things are still declining on every possible scale, just at a slower rate than before. But everything always gets better coming out of January, February, March, etc. These numbers need to be seasonally adjusted, and they need to be compared year-over year. They YoY declines are horrific.

So how long can this rally last?

See now we're getting into the CNBC-esqu crystal ball predictions that cause problems for investors and can get you into trouble. But just based on what I experienced in 2008 and the seasonality of most sectors of our economy, plus the temporary effects of immediate stimulus spending, I would accept Nouriel Roubini's estimate of late Q2 to late Q3 of 2009. So this rally can last a long time, but it will not last the entire year. The notion that the economy will turn positive by then end of the year is very hard to swallow.

I'm missing out on this enormous rally.

That is true, but you need to keep this rally in perspective. If you've been short since late 2007, this rally hasn't meant much to you. Consider how large it is in relation to the fall:


It is the nature of numbers that the bigger the fall, the bigger the rise - on an exponential scale - is needed to get back to the starting position. A 50% drop needs a 100% gain, but a 90% drop needs almost a 1,000% gain to get back to where it was. So you can see that Citi has risen nearly 400% from it's bottom, but after the loss it took it still isn't even back to $5 per share. If you know how to play a rally you can certainly make enormosu sums, but I don't know how to play short-term drops and rises. I can only look at fundamentals and think about where things will go long term.

Friday, May 8, 2009

Bank stress tests are a sham.

CR has a post linking a WSJ article which talks about the negotiations that occurred before the stress test results were released. It was all fake after all. This explains why Geithner stated the tests would be "reassuring" along time ago. That was the point from the beginning.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Back from the meeting

I think my biggest takeaway this year was just how bullish Warren is on the economy and on Wells Fargo in particular. He must have mentioned Wells 50 times over the course of the full weekend. The key point was essentially that yes there are problems but Wells will be able to earn its way out of those problems. I think that's true in the long run, but for this year Wells has marked down almost nothing and there are still systemic shocks to come.

The new question and answer session was much, much better this year. It seemed more like an annual meeting and less like a circus. Only one kid was put up to the mic this year, and he actually asked a legitimate question (how does my generation deal with the coming inflation? By focusing on your personal earnings potential).

By this point I do feel like I could hold the meeting myself and probably answer 95% of the questions in the exact way Warren would. Probably 50% of Charlie Munger's. By this point it becomes more about visiting friends each year in an annual gathering. Maybe getting a stock tip or two ;)

This was my fifth year in a row, and still as fun as ever.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Welcome to the scrum.

This is Warren walking through the exhibit hall before the meeting just trying to say hello to shareholders. Notice, at the end, the photographers trampling over the displays. I got caught up in this once and took an elbow to the face. It blows over you like a tornado.










Saturday, May 2, 2009

Off to the meeting!

It's go time.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Had a great night.

Had a great dinner with friends, picked up Sarah in Omaha for the first time ever, and made it back to the hotel at a reasonable time. I'll manage to get a good five hours of sleep this year. I'll be up at 5:30am and then it's off to the meeting. Attendance looks like it will be huge.

Headed out to Yellow BRKers right now.

I'm headed over to the Yellow BRKer's annual get together right now. I look forward to seeing some of you there -- please come up and say hello.

After that I'm going to stop by Borsheim's for the shareholder's reception. As strange as it seems, I've never been to the big Friday night gala. After that I'm having dinner with a few people and then I'll be heading over to Whitney Tilson's cocktail party.

Speaking of Whitney, he was on CNBC this morning calling this the most anticipated BRK meeting ever, and I agree with him completely.







Feel like a billion dollars.

All is well today. I feel even healthier than I did yesterday, so I may have lucked out. That's twice today.

Last night, I pulled into my last-minute hotel and it was -- less than ideal. On the disgusting scaled I'd rate this somewhere between a CDC test lab and the aftermath of the Avian flu chicken cullings. I had made my reservations far in advance - as I always do - at a great place for a great price, but I accidentally scheduled my checkout for Saturday rather than Sunday. I only realized this error four days ago. I quickly called to try to add Saturday night to my reservation, but of course it was far too late. If I tried to stay where I was and just do Saturday night somewhere else, I'd have to checkout by 3pm, which is right during the annual meeting. I don't have time to check into the new place and change clothes and such after the meeting because I have a hundred events to attend.

Thus, the only option was to cancel my entire reservation and book wherever I could get three nights. I did, and ended up and the most disgusting place I've ever stayed. It cost a good deal more than what I had previously booked, too.

I find it perplexing that the city of Omaha gets taken by surprise every single year by this meeting. Every year 30,000+ people pour into a quiet, mid-Western town. You'd think they'd get used to the routine, but no, if you book early for next year you get their regular, cheap mid-western prices. They don't raise rates until they start to get overbooked. As an example, I got a rental car at the Omaha-esque price of $17 per day because I booked last year. The guy in front of me in the rental car line was wanting the cheapest, smallest econo-box car they have and was quoted $120 per day. Why didn't they charge me more when they knew as well as I did this day was coming?

At any rate, this place was so disgusting I could not stay here again. On top of this, Sarah is flying in tonight to share the annual meeting with me for the first time ever. I can't have her staying here. As soon as I woke up I got back on hotels.com and Priceline trying desperately to find anywhere that could give me all three days. I lucked out and found a Holiday Inn not too far from downtown. It costs more than I just payed for The InterContinental in downtown San Francisco, and it sounds like Priceline is going to screw me and charge me for all three days at the CDC test lab even though the hotel itself said it would not, but I don't care. I had to get out of there. I think I have a strong case against being charged (since the manager said they would not) but even if they do, I'll chalk it up to learning a hard lesson about checking reservation dates.

I'm just happy I got a new place to stay and I have it through the entire weekend. I even called and asked if I could come over and check in right now -- five hours early -- because it is either that or sit in their lobby. I can't stay here!